Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Important Alcatraz Field Trip Information

Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay















Below are instructions for obtaining tickets for this month's optional Alcatraz field trip. Please follow directions carefully:
  1. Go to Alcatraz Cruises
  2. Look for the TICKETS & TOURS box in the upper-left hand corner
  3. Choose 4/23/11, the number of tickets ($26 each), then click SEARCH
  4. On the next page, look for the row labeled DAY TOUR AM and the column labeled SAT APR 23 2011, click on 9:30 AM
  5. On the next page, confirm the date and number of tickets, then click ADD TO CART
  6. Proceed to checkout (I'd recommend using the PRINT AT HOME eTICKET option)
After you've purchased your ticket, please leave a comment below to notify me so I can begin work on transportation options.

Again, this field trip is optional.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Could This Email to Paul Ceglia Cost Mark Zuckerberg 50% of Facebook?
















By Catharine Smith, The Huffington Post
04.12.11

Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg scored a major victory on Monday, when a U.S. appeals court ruled that the Winklevoss twins could not appeal their previous settlement with Facebook over claims that Zuckerberg had stolen their idea for a similar site. But the victory may prove to be short-lived.

Another of Zuckerberg's former challengers, Paul Ceglia, has again reared his head.

Ceglia, a New York state businessman, has produced new evidence in his case against Facebook. Last year, Ceglia filed a lawsuit claiming that Zuckerberg had signed a contract in 2003 that awarded Ceglia $1,000 and a 50-percent stake in the fledgeling social network. In return, Ceglia said that he worked as a designer and developer on Zuckerberg's site, while Zuckerberg worked as a coder for Ceglia's StreetFax.com.

Facebook denied Ceglia's initial claims, and many wondered why Ceglia had waited seven years to come forward. In addition, Ceglia had been arrested in 2009 and charged with criminal fraud.

While Ceglia's allegations seemed far-fetched in 2010, Business Insider reports that he has refiled his case and has brought forward more than a dozen emails allegedly written by Zuckerberg in 2003 and 2004.

In one purported email from 2003, Zuckerberg bounces around ideas for renaming the site and suggests that a good way to monetize would be to charge alumni $29.95 a month. In another, he mentions a pair of Harvard classmates [presumably the Winklevoss twins] who have a similar website idea. As the launch of Zuckerberg's website is delayed into 2004, the email correspondences begin to break down. Ceglia reminds Zuckerberg that their contract entitles him to a larger percentage of Zuckerberg's company the longer the site is delayed.

In an alleged email dated February 2, 2004, Zuckerberg mentions his contract with Ceglia explicitly, writing,

Paul, I have a rather serious issue to discuss with you, according to our contract, I owe you over 30% more of the business in late penalties which would give you over 80% of the company. First I want to say that I think that is completely unfair because I did so much extra work for you on your site [StreetFax.com] that caused those delays in the first place and second I don't even think it is legal to charge such a huge penalty. [...] I'd ike to suggest that you drop the penalty completely and that we officially return to 50/50 ownership.  

Ceglia agrees, according to later emails. Then, Zuckerberg backs out of the deal, writing to Ceglia that students have not shown much interest in the site and that he is considering ending the project.

If these emails are real, Ceglia stands to earn a huge payout from Facebook.

Facebook, on the other hand is flatly denying their authenticity. "This is a fraudulent lawsuit brought by a convicted felon, and we look forward to defending it in court," a Facebook lawyer told Bloomberg.

At the time Ceglia filed his first suit, Facebook was valued as high as $22 billion. Now, the site is believed to be worth over $50 billion.

Monday, April 11, 2011

Appeals Court Upholds Facebook Deal from 2008














The federal appeals panel rules that the deal between Mark Zuckerberg and Harvard colleagues Divya Narendra and Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss is valid and enforceable. 'At some point, litigation must come to an end,' a judge says. 'That point has now been reached.'

By Carol J. Williams, Los Angeles Times
04.11.11

A federal appeals court panel ruled Monday that a 2008 deal between Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and three former Harvard colleagues is valid and enforceable.

The decision upheld a negotiated agreement between Zuckerberg and the founders of a rival social-networking site, ConnectU, in their dispute over who came up with the Facebook idea by giving Divya Narendra and Olympic rowing twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss a share of the privately held company, deemed to be worth about $65 million at the time of the settlement three years ago. Because of Facebook's soaring value, that share is now worth in excess of $160 million.

In the opinion from Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who wrote for the three-judge panel, he said: "The Winklevosses are not the first parties bested by a competitor who then seek to gain through litigation what they were unable to achieve in the marketplace. And the courts might have obliged, had the Winklevosses not settled their dispute and signed a release of all claims against Facebook."

He concluded: "At some point, litigation must come to an end. That point has now been reached."

Lawyers for the ConnectU company, which Facebook acquires through the settlement, had argued that the twins and Narendra were fraudulently misled about the value of Facebook and that crucial details were omitted from the settlement, rendering it invalid. Facebook, now estimated to be worth more than $50 billion, is the world's largest social-networking site with 500 million members.

Facebook's legal team argued at the January hearing in San Francisco that it was the responsibility of the ConnectU owners to determine what Facebook was worth.

In a statement Monday, Facebook's deputy general counsel, Colin Stretch, said: "We appreciate the 9th Circuit's careful consideration of this case and are pleased the court has ruled in Facebook's favor."

The three 9th Circuit judges had expressed doubts at the hearing about the twins' claim that the deal was unenforceable for its lack of detail -- at one point noting that agreements written on scrap paper or the backs of napkins had been upheld in court.

The argument over who came up with the Facebook concept was the subject of last year's Oscar-winning film "The Social Network."
 

Sunday, April 10, 2011

Week 12: Santa Cruz

Cowell's Beach














  
Oh, you gotta be, oh, you gotta be
still living by the sea.

Oh, you gotta be, oh, you gotta be.

'Cause Santa Cruz
you're not that far.
Oh, Santa Cruz,
no, you're not that far.

—The Thrills, "Santa Cruz (You're Not That Far)"
Week 12: Santa Cruz
Mo 4.11 / Tu 4.12
Read: ACC—p. 231 – 255; eR—“Person of the Year 2010: Mark Zuckerberg” by Lev Grossman (Time), “Mark Zuckerberg & Facebook, Part 1” (60 Minutes), “Mark Zuckerberg & Facebook, Part 2” (60 Minutes), “The Face of Facebook” by Jose Antonio Vargas (The New Yorker)
In-Class: Reading discussion; Presentations; Preview—Editorial essay

We 4.13 / Th 4.14
Read: MYCAL—“Transients in Paradise” by Aimee Lu, “The Last Little Beach Town” by Edward Humes, “Bienvenidos a Newport Beach” by Firoozeh Dumas, “Berkeley” by Michael Chabon
In-class: Reading discussion; Presentations
Due: Reflection 6
Returned: Cause and effect essay 

Upcoming: 

Week 13: Mendocino
Mo 4.18 / Tu 4.19
Read: MYCAL—“The Line” by Ruben Martinez, “Flirting with Urbanismo” by Patt Morrison,
In-class: Reading discussion

We 4.20 / Th 4.21
Read: MYCAL­— “My Little Saigon” by Ahn Do, “The Nicest Person in San Francisco” by Derek Powaze, “The Un-California” by Daniel Weintraub
In-class: Reading discussion; Lecture—“California on TV”

Sa 4/23
Field trip: Details TBA—Participation optional