Sunday, May 22, 2011
Thank You for a Great Class!
Hi everyone,
Your grades are finished and will be entered into the system tomorrow around 2 PM, though they may not appear in MySJSU immediately. If you have any last minute issues to discuss with me, email me before 2 PM on Monday.
As for your finals, I was presently surprised at your scores. Despite a very challenging prompt, 24 out of 49 students scored a B- or above. One student even scored a perfect 12, so good work, everyone!
If you're interested in taking my 1Bs this fall, my two spirituality-based classes are: Sec.3, Mon/Wed 7:30 - 8:45 AM and Sec. 10, Mon/Wed 9:00 - 10:15 AM and my two ocean-themed classes are: Sec. 6: Tue/Thu 7:30 - 8:45 AM and Sec. 43: Fri 9:00 - 11:45 AM. I'd love to have you again.
I very much enjoyed both sections this spring, so again thank you for a great class. Have a great summer!
-D
Monday, May 16, 2011
Giants' New Video Targets Anti-Gay Bullying
By Rachel Gordon, San Francisco Chronicle
05.16.11
The San Francisco Giants will become the first professional sports team to jump into the burgeoning anti-homophobia campaign with an upbeat "It Gets Better" video designed to bring a ray of hope to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender young people.
While celebrities, politicians, corporate leaders and everyday people have posted more than 10,000 "It Gets Better" videos to YouTube to build awareness to the continuing problem of gay suicide and anti-gay bullying, no teams in the pro sports world have stepped forward to produce a video.
Lifelong Giants fan Sean Chapin began an online petition drive on the website change.org to get the Giants on board, and convinced more than 6,000 people to sign on.
"The San Francisco Giants are in an extraordinary position to lead the rest of the professional sporting world and possibly make the most important 'It Gets Better' video yet - not just as the recent world champion of Major League Baseball, but also as ambassadors of an iconic city, revered for celebrating diversity and differences with open arms," Chapin said in his own online video pitch to the Giants.
In an interview today, Chapin, a 35-year-old accountant who lives in San Francisco and works in Oakland, described the team's decision as a "breaking bubble" that will have profound reverberations.
Giants' spokeswoman Staci Slaughter said today that the team already had been thinking of joining the campaign before Chapin started his petition drive, but his efforts speeded things up. She said the exact content of the video, and which if any players or members of the coaching staff will participate, has not been determined.
Originally, the plan was to produce the video for the Giants LGBT Night home game in August, Slaughter said, "but now we're trying to get it done sooner than later."
The Giants have a strong gay and lesbian fan base and as an organization has a history of promoting tolerance, she said. In 1994, the Giants became the first team in the majors to dedicate a game every year to AIDS awareness.
Chapin said he got the idea to lobby the Giants to make a video after Los Angeles Lakers guard Kobe Bryant, angered over a foul called against him, mouthed an anti-gay slur at a referee last month. The National Basketball Association fined him $100,000 for the offense.
That was followed by an April 23 incident in which Atlanta Braves' pitching coach Roger McDowell reportedly asked three men in the stands at a Giants game in San Francisco, "Are you guys a homo couple or a threesome?" A witness said McDowell then made suggestive gestures with a bat. McDowell, who later apologized, was suspended by the league for two weeks.
Chapin, a native San Franciscan who came out as gay in high school, said he would like to see a day "when LGBT people can go to a pro sports game and be themselves, not feel like they have to hide who they are." He said he never really felt threatened himself, but noted that he wouldn't feel comfortable holding a boyfriend's hand or giving him a big smooch when the "kiss-cam" came around.
"Professional sports is one of the last havens for homophobia," said Susan Zieff, professor of kinesiology at San Francisco State University, who has focused on the socio-cultural study of physical activity.
She said the Giants planned video "could make a huge difference" in helping blunt acceptance of anti-gay rhetoric and behavior.
"A large number of fans are young people who look up to athletes as role models and there's a real potential to raise awareness about an issue that is bigger than sports."
Even if the Giants get some complaints from fans, Zieff said, "it's the right thing to do."
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Week 17: Malibu
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Experiencing California: The Bay to Breakers 12K Foot Race (May 15, 2011)
| Costumes are encouraged at annual Bay to Breakers |
What has to be one of the wildest marathons in the world happens this weekend in San Francisco, the 100th Annual Bay to Breakers 12k Foot Race. Thousands of participants, many of whom come in costume, turn the race into a miles-long street party. Registration is officially closed, but there is still much fun to be had.
Get more information here. Be sure to take public transportation.
Friday, May 13, 2011
Facebook-Google 'Cold War' Suddenly Gets Hot
By Sharon Gaudin, Computerworld05.13.11
Facebook's surreptitious public relations campaign against Google shows how intense the competition has
become between the two companies -- and what lengths Facebook will go to in the fight.
"There's always been a cold war with skirmishes on varying fronts since Facebook came on the scene so big," said Dan Olds, an analyst with The Gabriel Consulting Group. "They increasingly see themselves as rivals with Google for advertising dollars. This shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. The competition? It'll probably go even farther. We'll see more hard-nosed competition coming."
Facebook admitted this week to hiring a well-known PR firm to plant anti-Google stories in the media.
Both Facebook and the PR firm, Burson-Marsteller, admitted Thursday to trying to get journalists and bloggers to write negative articles about Google's privacy practices. While Facebook denied that it was pushing a "smear campaign," industry analysts said the surreptitious back-stabbing is a clear indication of how heated it's become between the two Internet behemoths.
"They realized they needed to do battle," he added. "They just misused their weapon.... Either stop doing this kind of thing or do it well."
Both Hadley Reynolds, an analyst with IDC, and Olds said one problem here is that Facebook executives are simply too immature and too inexperienced in business to handle this level of competition. It'll take a lot of business savvy to take down that kind of rival. And Facebook's misstep raises questions about whether co-founder Mark Zuckerberg and associates have that kind of savvy.
"To me, Facebook is too immature to be in the position it's in," said Reynolds. "It's growing too fast. It's in a spot where it's vulnerable to make stupid mistakes like this. In the past, it's made stupid mistakes exposing people's information and creating security leaks. This is less an issue of technology and more about management bringing mature judgment to growing a responsible business."
And Facebook's own privacy mistakes add another level to this whole issue.
"Facebook is recognizing that Google is its biggest threat," said Rob Enderle, an analyst with the Enderle Group. "Google is clearly gearing up for a run at social networking.... If anybody could put Facebook out of business at this point, it would be Google.
"A head-to-head competition between the two companies would probably end up with Google winning and Facebook gone," he said.
The competition, and apparently ill will, between Facebook and Google has grown in recent months.
Last fall, Microsoft tightened its ties with Facebook, with the two companies working to make Internet search more social. It was a move that represented the biggest threat to Google's search standing yet.
After that partnership was announced, Ray Valdes, an analyst at Gartner, told Computerworld that there was a growing strategic conflict between Facebook and Google.
"There is a battle for the future of the Web, and it is not about search engines, but about the social Web," said Valdes at the time. "The competition is between the new and the old -- between Facebook as the early leader in the social Web, and Google as the dominant player in the content Web. Everyone else, such as Microsoft, Yahoo and Twitter, will play a secondary role, and will start lining up on one side or the other."
Given that level of rivalry, Enderle said he's not surprised that Facebook would use a PR company to target such a big foe.
What Facebook got caught doing was trying to seed stories in the media about Google's privacy practices. This comes from a social networking company that has had more than its share of privacy and security blunders.
"For one thing, this seems to be to deflect attention from the terrible track record Facebook has in protecting user information," said Reynolds. "This is classic the pot going down shouting that the kettle is black."
Both Reynolds and Olds noted that if Facebook wants to take its competitor down a few pegs, it needs to be careful about what flaws it's calling out.
"Facebook needs to realize they're not a teeny tiny company," said Olds. "They're too big a company to be able to get away with this kind of thing. They could have made these same points through regular communications without this skullduggery and they wouldn't have ended up in this spot. "
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Reflection 8: Take Your Pick—The Ethnic Foods of California
![]() |
| A selection of pan dulce from a Mexican panaderia |
What do you feel like for dinner tonight? A bowl of steaming Pho Tai Bo Vien? Maybe a plate of spicy Tacos al Pastor? How about a fragrant Masaledaar Bhindi with sides of Tadkewali Peeli Dal and Naan? As residents of California, particularly in the Bay Area, we have easy access to these foods and many more. In fact, we have some of the most diverse food offerings in the world. For your final reflection, visit a local ethnic restaurant (or market) to sample their cultural cuisine. Please choose food that is not of your own ethnicity, and there is no need to spend a lot of money. And if possible, eat at that location so as to better absorb the culture. Where you go is up to you, but you might consider visiting an Indian or Middle Eastern bazaar (e.g. New India Bazar), an Italian deli (e.g. La Villa Gourmet Italian Delicatessen), an Asian supermarket (e.g. 99 Ranch Market), or a Latino mercardo (e.g. Super Mercado Mexico). Bon appetite!
Requirements:
- MLA format
- 2 pages minimum
Due: Email to me by 10 PM on Mo 4.16 / Tu 4.17
Monday, May 9, 2011
For Your Final Exam...
In preparation for your final exam, I've written a sample essay to guide you in the Department's expectations. It is annotated to highlight specific techniques.
We will discuss this Jihad/McWorld prompt in class. Find the prompt here and the response essay here. Also, the final exam rubric is here.
Also for your consideration:
The Fall 2009 and Fall 2010 prompts.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Week 16: Folsom
I hear the train a comin'; it's rollin' 'round the bend,
And I ain't seen the sunshine since I don't know when.
I'm stuck at Folsom Prison and time keeps draggin' on.
But that train keeps rollin' on down to San Antone.
And I ain't seen the sunshine since I don't know when.
I'm stuck at Folsom Prison and time keeps draggin' on.
But that train keeps rollin' on down to San Antone.
—Johnny Cash, "Folsom Prison Blues"
Week 16: Folsom
Mo 5.9 / Tu 5.10
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
We 5.11 / Th 5.12
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
Sa 5.14
Final exam: BBC 226 @ 8 AM
Mo 5.9 / Tu 5.10
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
We 5.11 / Th 5.12
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
Sa 5.14
Final exam: BBC 226 @ 8 AM
Upcoming:
Week 17: Malibu
Mo 5.16 / Tu 5.17
In-class: Course review
Due: Reflection 8
Mo 5.16 / Tu 5.17
In-class: Course review
Due: Reflection 8
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Change With a Straight Face Barrels Into the Castro
By Scott James, New York Times
05.07.11
There’s an old saying in San Francisco: Market Street is straight, until it reaches the Castro.
Cartographically true, it refers to the city’s famously gay mecca. But these days, there are concerns that the neighborhood is becoming slightly less bent.
A Different Light Bookstore, which specialized in gay and lesbian literature for 26 years, shut last weekend — the latest in a series of closings of longtime businesses that were gay-owned and operated or catered to gay clientele. The neighborhood is littered with empty storefronts.
Amid this gloom, however, there is one burst of excitement that has crowds lining up, drawing visitors from throughout the Bay Area and beyond: Sunday brunch at Lime on Market.
With “bottomless Mimosas,” the restaurant and club has become so popular that it can take weeks to get a reservation. Patrons regularly defy stanchions and block sidewalks as they wait to cram inside where techno pop music blares at rock concert decibels.
“It’s the only place like L.A. in San Francisco,” a British man said last month as he was shooed inside by the bouncer.
The crowd, to a large extent, is straight.
But even in a part of the city known for anything-goes partying, the scene at Lime has soured some residents and led them to ask, What’s happening to our neighborhood?
Scott Wiener, who represents the neighborhood on the Board of Supervisors, said his office had received a litany of complaints in recent months.
“A lot of extremely drunk people behaving obnoxiously loud, urinating in public, vomiting,” Mr. Wiener said, running through a list of concerns from constituents. “A few accounts of homophobic slurs,” he added, but he thought those incidents were rare and asked that they be played down.
There have also been reports of locals’ casting anti-straight aspersions at Lime patrons.
But most of the frustrations seem to center on the idea that outsiders have invaded the Castro primarily for one reason: to get drunk.
Visits to Lime on several Sunday afternoons in March and April documented a number of incidents: patrons drinking what appeared to be alcohol outside the club; customers so groggy they had to be held upright; people staggering from the club and walking directly into moving traffic; and puddles of vomit sullying the block.
“It’s an issue because of the behavior that’s happening as a result of overserving,” said Andrea Aiello, executive director of the Castro/Upper Market Community Benefit District, a neighborhood improvement program.
For $7, customers can consume unlimited Mimosas (bottomless Bloody Marys are $12) — a recession-friendly offering. Lime is one of several establishments in the city now serving alcohol this way.
Such all-you-can-drink promotions are legal, but “definitely a concern, as is anything that promotes intoxication,” said John Carr, spokesman for the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. “It’s frowned upon.”
The results of this bargain-basement inebriation have overwhelmed some nearby businesses. There have been reports of brawling, and male customers have been spotted relieving themselves on the walls of nearby shops and residences. On Sundays, two businesses have posted “no restrooms” signs to keep tipsy Lime customers away. (The lines can be long for Lime’s restrooms.)
Ms. Aiello said that her organization reached out last month to the club’s owner, Greg Bronstein, to work on resolving the problems, but that he was unresponsive. Mr. Bronstein twice scheduled interviews for this column, but failed to follow through and stopped responding to messages.
Mr. Wiener said he had spoken to Mr. Bronstein and elicited a promise to control customers. On one recent Sunday the club’s exasperated doorman, who looked like a male Grace Jones, was seen struggling to control the crowd to little avail.
The controversy swirling around Lime has hit at a time when the neighborhood is suffering. In addition to the bookstore’s closing, four local restaurants went out of business in recent weeks, and in previous months longtime record and video shops have disappeared. Other businesses are also reportedly teetering on failure.
Bevan Dufty, the district’s former supervisor and a current mayoral candidate, said the neighborhood was in transition. He blamed economics — not sexual orientation.
“This is a fallout from the economic collapse,” Mr. Dufty said, “and the recovery was always expected to be slow.”
Indeed, when the details were considered, each closing appeared to be due to fiscal realities. For example, retail sales of books, videos and music have been affected nearly everywhere by Internet commerce, and some businesses failed when leases expired and parties could not agree to new terms.
Still, the totality of so many losses of established gay businesses has been felt. The Castro has been an enclave for gay men and lesbians since the 1970s. Harvey Milk, the assassinated gay civil rights leader, set in motion a national movement from a humble camera shop there.
The district has never been exclusively gay (one-third of residents self-identify as gay men or lesbians, compared with 13 percent in the city), but there has been some trouble in the past between residents and visitors. A large Halloween street party raged peacefully for years until it became a popular destination for tens of thousands of revelers — many of them heterosexual — from elsewhere in the region beginning in the late 1990s. Episodes of homophobia and violence followed, and in 2006 nine people were shot and wounded in a melee. The party has since been canceled or curtailed.
In this context the incidents at Lime have become a flash point. Yet change in the Castro seems inevitable. In an age when homosexuals are receiving greater acceptance, fewer feel compelled to live in ghettos as they once did, and that means a more substantial mix of residents is likely, as well as services that meet their needs.
In fact, some establishments have opened in the area and attracted both gay and straight patronage without the drama surrounding Lime. Two blocks down Market, the bar Blackbird is flourishing with just such a mix.
Mr. Dufty hailed Blackbird’s success as a positive example of the neighborhood’s evolution. But he also said that the district’s legacy should not be forgotten and that its gay centricity needed to be maintained.
“You can’t take the Castro for granted. It’s worth fighting for,” he said. “We seek to be inclusive, but it’s essential that we remain anchored in our LGBT heritage.”
J. D. Petras, a businessman with several properties in the Castro, including Cafe Flore, a popular outdoor restaurant, has watched the Castro develop for more than 30 years.
“I’d love to see the Castro be a gay ghetto like it was in the 1970s,” he said, “but we don’t need it anymore. Gay people are everywhere.”
Despite some of the problems that others have reported, Mr. Petras said he welcomed the crowds flocking to Lime. He said the club’s patrons were helping to revive the depressed local economy.
“It’s fun for young kids coming into the big city,” he said. “It’s good for our neighborhood. Who the hell cares if it’s gay, mixed or straight?”
Now, if only they could be potty trained, then perhaps the rest of the neighbors would feel as accommodating.
“I don’t want it to be spring break each weekend,” Mr. Dufty said.
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Congress Considers West Coast Oil Drilling
By Susanne Rust, California Watch
05.04.11
Nearly a year after a BP oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico and created one of the largest environmental catastrophes of all time, federal lawmakers are considering encouraging drilling off the West Coast, including the rich oil beds off Southern California.
Lawmakers say allowing the drilling would ease the burden of high oil prices and provide an alternative to foreign oil.
Supporters, including the Energy Nation, an oil industry advocacy group, say the bills will produce more domestic oil and gas, create jobs, provide revenue for the government and secure the country's energy future.
Critics say the bills (HR 1229, HR 1230 and HR 1231) set the stage for environmental disaster and will have little or no effect on oil prices.
“Not only will the bills expand drilling, they would leave oversight of offshore drilling weaker than it was before last year’s oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico,” said Bob Keefe, a spokesman for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Richard Charter, senior policy adviser for Defenders of Wildlife, said the bills would have no effect on the "price at the pump."
"That's decided by oil speculators who run up oil prices till the price skyrockets," he said.
He referred to a study conducted by the federal government's Energy Information Administration, which showed that new drilling off the country's coasts would only reduce gas prices by a few cents.
The bills passed the House Committee on Natural Resources in April, and two of the three bills are scheduled for a vote on Thursday. The third bill, which some call the most sweeping, will likely go to the floor next week, Charter said.
That third bill, HR 1231, or “Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act,” would require the federal government to lease at least 50 percent of available unleased acreage off the West Coast, Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico and much of the East Coast, every five years.
"It's the 'Law of Eventually Drilling Everything,'" Charter said.
Under existing law, the government decides which areas to lease. This new law would effectively double the current level of offshore drilling.
And states, such as California, would have no say in the matter.
“Earlier versions of bills like this generally allowed a state to veto projects,” said Regan Nelson of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
“Californians have consistently made it clear that they oppose new offshore drilling off their coast," she said.
“This bill is so out of sync of what people want. They’re willing to put oil production over all other considerations.”
Supporters of the bills say the need for more domestic oil is urgent.
"Gas prices in California’s Central Valley have skyrocketed to above $4 a gallon and remained above the national average for weeks," said Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., one of the three local congressmen who voted for the bills.
"We can no longer afford to rely on energy supplies from unstable foreign sources. The time for inaction is over. We must expand domestic energy production to get Americans back to work, bring relief at the pump and create jobs,” he said.
Along with Denham, Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., and Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., supported the bills.
Rep. Grace Napolitano, D-Calif., voted against the bills and Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., voted against one of the bills and was absent for the other two.
Costa was just one of two Democrats to support the bills. He did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
05.04.11
Nearly a year after a BP oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico and created one of the largest environmental catastrophes of all time, federal lawmakers are considering encouraging drilling off the West Coast, including the rich oil beds off Southern California.
Lawmakers say allowing the drilling would ease the burden of high oil prices and provide an alternative to foreign oil.
Supporters, including the Energy Nation, an oil industry advocacy group, say the bills will produce more domestic oil and gas, create jobs, provide revenue for the government and secure the country's energy future.
Critics say the bills (HR 1229, HR 1230 and HR 1231) set the stage for environmental disaster and will have little or no effect on oil prices.
“Not only will the bills expand drilling, they would leave oversight of offshore drilling weaker than it was before last year’s oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico,” said Bob Keefe, a spokesman for the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Richard Charter, senior policy adviser for Defenders of Wildlife, said the bills would have no effect on the "price at the pump."
"That's decided by oil speculators who run up oil prices till the price skyrockets," he said.
He referred to a study conducted by the federal government's Energy Information Administration, which showed that new drilling off the country's coasts would only reduce gas prices by a few cents.
The bills passed the House Committee on Natural Resources in April, and two of the three bills are scheduled for a vote on Thursday. The third bill, which some call the most sweeping, will likely go to the floor next week, Charter said.
That third bill, HR 1231, or “Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act,” would require the federal government to lease at least 50 percent of available unleased acreage off the West Coast, Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico and much of the East Coast, every five years.
"It's the 'Law of Eventually Drilling Everything,'" Charter said.
Under existing law, the government decides which areas to lease. This new law would effectively double the current level of offshore drilling.
And states, such as California, would have no say in the matter.
“Earlier versions of bills like this generally allowed a state to veto projects,” said Regan Nelson of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
“Californians have consistently made it clear that they oppose new offshore drilling off their coast," she said.
“This bill is so out of sync of what people want. They’re willing to put oil production over all other considerations.”
Supporters of the bills say the need for more domestic oil is urgent.
"Gas prices in California’s Central Valley have skyrocketed to above $4 a gallon and remained above the national average for weeks," said Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Calif., one of the three local congressmen who voted for the bills.
"We can no longer afford to rely on energy supplies from unstable foreign sources. The time for inaction is over. We must expand domestic energy production to get Americans back to work, bring relief at the pump and create jobs,” he said.
Along with Denham, Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., and Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif., supported the bills.
Rep. Grace Napolitano, D-Calif., voted against the bills and Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif., voted against one of the bills and was absent for the other two.
Costa was just one of two Democrats to support the bills. He did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Web Tracking Bill Draws Fire from Facebook, Google
Tech group says California bill like ‘Texas stopping the oil industry’
By John Letzing, MarketWatch.com
05.03.11
The so-called Do Not Track Internet privacy legislation introduced by California State Senator Alan Lowenthal would require Internet companies to give users a way to comprehensively opt out of having information, such as their name or location, collected online. Companies that fail to comply could face civil legal action, according to the bill.
Large Internet firms have generally bristled at the notion of regulating their collection of user data, which helps target online advertising. Companies argue that policing their own, collective privacy policies makes more sense than passing legislation. An Internet privacy bill proposed recently at the federal level does not include a specific Do Not Track provision.
California’s State Senate Judiciary Committee voted on Tuesday to move Lowenthal’s Do Not Track bill forward to the Appropriations Committee. Lowenthal said during the committee hearing that his legislation “is consistent with California’s long history of championing privacy issues.”
\
However, Fred Main, a representative of TechNet, a policy group representing technology companies, countered during the hearing that by stifling the Internet firms that spur much of the economic growth in the state, the bill would be “the equivalent of Texas stopping the oil industry.”
Facebook, Google and other Internet firms have lobbied California lawmakers this year on Sen. Lowenthal’s proposed Do Not Track legislation, according to public filings.
In a letter sent last week to Sen. Lowenthal, Facebook, Google , Yahoo Inc. and a number of other firms wrote that his proposed legislation would create unnecessary confusion and would add significant new costs for cash-strapped regulators.
“The measure would negatively affect consumers who have come to expect rich content and free services through the Internet, and would make them more vulnerable to security threats,” the companies wrote in the letter, reviewed by MarketWatch.
“It would prove costly to the state and cumbersome for the Attorney General to figure out how to regulate under the bill and to enforce the law,” the letter said.
Representatives from Facebook and Google declined to comment.
Others signing the letter to Sen. Lowenthal included TechNet, which counts Facebook, Google, Microsoft Corp. , Apple Inc. and many other firms as members.
They were joined by other organizations and firms including the Motion Picture Association of America, the California Retailers Association and insurer Allstate Corp.
In the letter, the firms argue that the Network Advertising Initiative, a self-policing organization for the online advertising industry, already provides “easy-to-use mechanisms to opt out of interest-based advertising from more than 60 companies.”
In the letter, the firms argue that the Network Advertising Initiative, a self-policing organization for the online advertising industry, already provides “easy-to-use mechanisms to opt out of interest-based advertising from more than 60 companies.”
Google unveiled a tool for its Chrome Internet browser earlier this year that enables users to opt out of tracking, while Microsoft has added similar technology to its Internet Explorer browser.
During the State Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Lowenthal acknowledged the new privacy tools offered by individual firms, but added that “the mechanism is often not simple, or user-friendly.”
Jeff Chester, a privacy advocate and executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, said that strong
Do Not Track legislation has made little progress in Washington, D.C. — making a focus on state bills necessary.
“The online ad lobby has convinced Washington that Do Not Track will kill off the Internet economy,” Chester said. “We think there’s a real role now for states to come in, and regulate the profiling going on within their borders.”
Chester said that if California does not ultimately pass Sen. Lowenthal’s Do Not Track bill, he and others may push for a related ballot initiative in the state.
Sen. Lowenthal’s bill is sponsored by Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit group that has been funded to publicly challenge Google’s privacy policies and government lobbying.
In their letter to Sen. Lowenthal opposing his legislation, Google and others say that the Internet sector employs roughly 162,000 people in California, and is “the fastest growing source of jobs in the state.”
The Do Not Track Bill “would create a second, conflicting set of standards to which companies would have to conform or else face class-action lawsuits,” the companies argue. “This would, in turn, create significant confusion and uncertainty for investors, businesses and consumers.”
Chester said it’s natural that Internet firms, which rely on serving relevant advertising to a growing number of users, would challenge Sen. Lowenthal’s Do Not Track bill, as “they have the most to lose.”
Monday, May 2, 2011
Week 15: Monterey
![]() |
| Fisherman's Wharf |
The people came and listened
Some of them came and played
Others gave flowers away
Yes they did
Down in Monterey
Down in Monterey
Some of them came and played
Others gave flowers away
Yes they did
Down in Monterey
Down in Monterey
—The Animals, "Monterey"
Week 15: Monterey
Mo 5.2 / Tu 5.3
Read: CALU—Excerpt from Holy Land by D.J.Waldie, “Pruning Generations” by David Mas Masumoto, Excerpt from Travels with Charley by John Steinbeck, “The Light Takes Its Color from the Sea” by James D. Houston, “My Ride, My Revolution” by Luis J. Rodriguez, “Where the Poppies Grow” by Richard Rodriguez
In-Class: Reading discussion; Presentations
Due: Editorial essay (Final draft, attach draft 1 and, on a separate sheet, one paragraph rationale for your revisions)
We 5.4 / Th 5.5
In-Class: Autobiographical essay (Bring both California Uncovered and My California)
Upcoming:
Week 16: Folsom
Mo 5.9 / Tu 5.10
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
We 5.11 / Th 5.12
In-Class: Final exam prep; Presentations
Due: Reflection 8
Sa 5.14
Final exam: 8 AM, location TBD
Note: My Monday office hour is moved to Tuesday until May 9th.
Friday, April 29, 2011
Monday, April 25, 2011
SETI Institute Suspends Search for Aliens
By Lisa M. Krieger, San Jose Mercury News
If E.T. phones Earth, he'll get a "disconnect" signal.
Lacking the money to pay its operating expenses, Mountain View's SETI Institute has pulled the plug on the renowned Allen Telescope Array, a field of radio dishes -- popularized in the Jodie Foster film "Contact" -- that scan the skies for signals from extraterrestrial civilizations.
In an April 22 letter to donors, SETI Institute CEO Tom Pierson said that last week the array was put into "hibernation," safe but nonfunctioning, because of inadequate government support.
The timing couldn't be worse, say SETI scientists. After millenniums of musings, this spring astronomers announced that 1,235 new possible planets had been observed by Kepler, a telescope on a space satellite.
They predict that dozens of these planets will be Earth-sized -- and some will be in the "habitable zone," where the temperatures are just right for liquid water, a prerequisite of life as we know it.
"There is a huge irony," said SETI Director Jill Tartar, "that a time when we discover so many planets to look at, we don't have the operating funds to listen."
SETI senior astronomer Seth Shostak compared the project's suspension to "the Niña, Pinta and Santa Maria being put into dry dock. "... This is about exploration, and we want to keep the thing operational. It's no good to have it sit idle.
"We have the radio antennae up, but we can't run them without operating funds," he added.
"Honestly, if everybody contributed just 3 extra cents on their 1040 tax forms, we could find out if we have cosmic company."
The SETI Institute's mission is to explore the origin, nature and prevalence of life in the universe. This is a profound search, it believes, because it explains our place among the stars.
The program, located on U.S. Forest Service land near Mount Shasta, uses telescopes to listen for anything out of the ordinary -- a numerical sequence of "beeps," say, or crackly dialogue from an alien version of a disembodied "Charlie" talking to his "Angels." The entire program was set up to prove what once seemed unthinkable: In the universe, we are not alone.
However, successful private funding came from donors such as Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, allowing SETI to raise $50 million to build the 42 dishes.
Plans called for construction of 350 individual radio antennas, all working in concert. But what's lacking now is funding to support the day-to-day costs of running the dishes.
This is the responsibility of UC Berkeley's Radio Astronomy Laboratory, but one of the university's major funders, the National Science Foundation, supplied only one-tenth its previous support. Meanwhile, the state of California has also cut funding.
About $5 million is needed over the next two years, according to Tarter. She hopes the U.S. Air Force will help, because the array can be used to track satellite-threatening debris in space. But budgets are tight there as well.
Meanwhile, other SETI projects will continue, such as the "setiQuest Explorer" (www.setiquest.org), an application that allows citizen scientist volunteers to look for patterns from existing data that might have been missed by existing algorithms. Through a new partnership with "Galaxy Zoo" (www.galaxyzoo.org), this project runs in real time, so discoveries can be followed up on immediately.
Bay Area astronomers mourned the hiatus of the SETI program and expressed concern about the future.
Rob Hawley of the Peninsula Astronomical Society called it "unfortunate. The Allen scope was a wonderful experiment. "... Hubble gets all the press, but there are lots of limitations."
Amateur astronomer Sarah Wiehe of Palo Alto said, "just knowing SETI is there was significant for us. This is a setback."
"If we miss a distant signal," she added, "it would be a terrible loss."
If E.T. phones Earth, he'll get a "disconnect" signal.
Lacking the money to pay its operating expenses, Mountain View's SETI Institute has pulled the plug on the renowned Allen Telescope Array, a field of radio dishes -- popularized in the Jodie Foster film "Contact" -- that scan the skies for signals from extraterrestrial civilizations.
In an April 22 letter to donors, SETI Institute CEO Tom Pierson said that last week the array was put into "hibernation," safe but nonfunctioning, because of inadequate government support.
The timing couldn't be worse, say SETI scientists. After millenniums of musings, this spring astronomers announced that 1,235 new possible planets had been observed by Kepler, a telescope on a space satellite.
They predict that dozens of these planets will be Earth-sized -- and some will be in the "habitable zone," where the temperatures are just right for liquid water, a prerequisite of life as we know it.
"There is a huge irony," said SETI Director Jill Tartar, "that a time when we discover so many planets to look at, we don't have the operating funds to listen."
SETI senior astronomer Seth Shostak compared the project's suspension to "the Niña, Pinta and Santa Maria being put into dry dock. "... This is about exploration, and we want to keep the thing operational. It's no good to have it sit idle.
"We have the radio antennae up, but we can't run them without operating funds," he added.
"Honestly, if everybody contributed just 3 extra cents on their 1040 tax forms, we could find out if we have cosmic company."
The SETI Institute's mission is to explore the origin, nature and prevalence of life in the universe. This is a profound search, it believes, because it explains our place among the stars.
The program, located on U.S. Forest Service land near Mount Shasta, uses telescopes to listen for anything out of the ordinary -- a numerical sequence of "beeps," say, or crackly dialogue from an alien version of a disembodied "Charlie" talking to his "Angels." The entire program was set up to prove what once seemed unthinkable: In the universe, we are not alone.
Lack of funding
But funding for SETI has long been a headache for E.T.-seekers. NASA bankrolled some early projects, but in 1994, Sen. Richard Bryan of Nevada convinced Congress that it wasn't worth the cost, calling it the "Great Martian Chase" and complaining that not a single flying saucer had applied for FAA approval.
Plans called for construction of 350 individual radio antennas, all working in concert. But what's lacking now is funding to support the day-to-day costs of running the dishes.
This is the responsibility of UC Berkeley's Radio Astronomy Laboratory, but one of the university's major funders, the National Science Foundation, supplied only one-tenth its previous support. Meanwhile, the state of California has also cut funding.
About $5 million is needed over the next two years, according to Tarter. She hopes the U.S. Air Force will help, because the array can be used to track satellite-threatening debris in space. But budgets are tight there as well.
Astronomers mourn
The Allen array is not the only radio telescope facility that can be used for SETI searches. But it is the best; elsewhere, scientists have to borrow time on other telescopes.
Bay Area astronomers mourned the hiatus of the SETI program and expressed concern about the future.
Rob Hawley of the Peninsula Astronomical Society called it "unfortunate. The Allen scope was a wonderful experiment. "... Hubble gets all the press, but there are lots of limitations."
Amateur astronomer Sarah Wiehe of Palo Alto said, "just knowing SETI is there was significant for us. This is a setback."
"If we miss a distant signal," she added, "it would be a terrible loss."
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Week 14: San Francisco
![]() |
| The Transamerica Pyramid |
I meet a girl in Mexico, I should of told her then I know,
that I still think of you, we never will be through.
San Francisco days, San Francisco nights.
San Francisco days, San Francisco nights.
I still love you, I still want you.
I still need you, don't hang up and say goodbye.
—Chris Isaak, "San Francisco Days"
Week 14: San Francisco
Mo 4. 25 / Tu 4.26
In-class: Writer’s workshop; Preview—Autobiographical essay
Due: Editorial essay (Draft 1, bring 3 copies)
We 4.27 / Th 4.28
In-class:
Due: Reflection 7
Upcoming:
Week 15: Monterey
Mo 5.2 / Tu 5.3
Read: CALU—Excerpt from Holy Land by D.J.Waldie, “Pruning Generations” by David Mas Masumoto, Excerpt from Travels with Charley by John Steinbeck, “The Light Takes Its Color from the Sea” by James D. Houston, “My Ride, My Revolution” by Luis J. Rodriguez, “Where the Poppies Grow” by Richard Rodriguez
In-Class: Reading discussion; Presentations
Due: Editorial essay (Final draft, attach draft 1 and, on a separate sheet, one paragraph rationale for your revisions)
We 5.4 / Th 5.5
In-Class: Autobiographical essay
Note: My Monday office hour is moved to Tuesday until May 9th.
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Reflection 7: Shaking Things Up—Living in Earthquake Country
![]() |
| Pacific Avenue in Santa Cruz after the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake |
California is earthquake country. We all know it. We should all be prepared. We all expect "The Big One" to come ... someday. But aside from the occasional tremblor, it's sometimes easy to forget about just how perilous the place we call home can be. Yet, as we recently witnessed in Japan, living in an earthquake-prone area can have devastating impacts. Here at home, the East Bay's Hayward Fault, called the most dangerous urban fault in America, sits under two and a half million residents. In fact, all of California's major cities lay on or near potentially catastrophic fault lines. And yet, we stay put. Why? Why do we put ourselves at so much risk to live here—and why are so many others still clamoring to live here? Is California worth the risk? How often do you think of the dangers of earthquakes? Do they impact your life on a daily basis? Finally, are you prepared for a major quake?
Requirements:
- MLA format
- 2 pages minimum
Due: We 4.27 / Th 4.28
Friday, April 22, 2011
Bangor Man Arrested After Calling San Francisco Man a ‘Sexual Slur’
By Nok-Noi Ricker, Bangor Daily News 04.20.11
BANGOR, Maine — A local man who apparently repeatedly called a man from San Francisco a sexual slur caused a Tuesday night fight at Longhorn Steakhouse and was arrested, Sgt. Paul Edwards said on Wednesday.
Three Bangor police officers were called to the Hogan Road restaurant at 9:45 p.m. to deal with Kevin Schmersal, 58, who got into a fight with a group of five men and one woman — at least one of whom was from San Fransisco — at the restaurant’s bar, the sergeant said. The California city is known for its gay community.
After finding out the victim was from San Francisco, “Mr. Schmersal then allegedly made a derogatory remark about his sexuality based on his hometown,” Edwards said in a statement.
“He thought it was his right to say whatever he wanted,” the police sergeant added Wednesday, saying he was barred from releasing exactly what Schmersal called the visiting man.
The California man’s son became upset by Schmersal’s remarks and he and others in the group began fighting with Schmersal.
“There were actually punches thrown, but no one got hit,” Edwards said.
Bangor police Officers Kim Donnell, Gary Decker and Richard Polk went to Longhorn and found the group outside the restaurant waiting to talk to them, while Schmersal and his wife, Patti, waited inside.
When Donnell and Decker interviewed Schmersal, “that is when he became irate and continued to try and justify using that word,” Edwards said. “Then he just lunged at Officer Kim Donnell in an aggressive manner” and was subdued by the officers and then arrested.
Schmersal was charged with disorderly conduct and taken to Penobscot County Jail but was later released, he said. If convicted of the disorderly conduct charge, he could face up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $2,000.
“The case is being forwarded to the Attorney General’s Office for review in order to see if any hate crime laws have been violated,” Edwards said.
The Schmersals appeared in the Bangor Daily News at the end of March in a story about criticism from neighbors concerning their home-based dog breeding operation and kennel on Pushaw Road.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
Obama as a Chimp? E-mail Gives California GOP Problems It Didn't Need
By Daniel B. Wood, Christian Science Monitor04.19.11
State party officials have categorically condemned the e-mail by Marilyn Davenport, which shows the altered picture of Obama with the caption: “Now you know why – No birth certificate!” California Republican Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro said "the actions in question are completely unacceptable.”
Yet the fact that a Republican official in Orange County – sometimes called “the most Republican county in the US" – so obviously endorses the "birther" movement and promoted it in a borderline racist e-mail runs the risk of confirming negative GOP stereotypes for some California voters.
“This underscores the problems that the Republican Party is having in the state of California, and spotlights the perception they are having nationally that the GOP is white, conservative, and sometimes insensitive to race," says Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, a political scientist at the School of Policy, Planning, and Development at the University of Southern California.
As immigration has recast California and helped push it left of center, the Republican Party has adamantly stayed true to the small government, anti-illegal immigration credo that emerged from Orange County in the 1980s and made the party a potent political force through the early '90s.
More recently, however, that platform has been an electoral stumbling block. For the second time since 1882, no Republican was elected to statewide office last November. (The other time was 2002.) Moreover, Republicans are only three seats away – one in the Assembly and two in the Senate – from being outnumbered 2 to 1 in each chamber of the California Legislature.
Ms. Davenport apologized for the e-mail Monday. “I wasn’t wise in sending the e-mail out. I shouldn’t have done it. I really wasn’t thinking when I did it.”
The monkey caricature is not necessarily racist, some political experts note. President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld – all white – have been targets of monkey comparisons online, with one famous critic calling Bush “Curious George."
But political experts say the damage is done. Several activist groups have called for Davenport’s resignation, and the state party is trying to distance itself.
Orange County Republican Chairman Scott Baugh has called for Davenport to resign, saying the e-mail was "dripping with racism and is in very poor taste."
Meanwhile, Gary Aminoff, former vice chairman of the Republican Party of Los Angeles County, called Davenport one bad apple.
“The actions of a single misguided, or possibly racist, Republican should not reflect badly on the Republican Party as a whole,” he says. “It has been made clear by leaders of the Republican Party in Orange County that they do not approve of the actions of Marilyn Davenport and such action was not an official Republican Party e-mail.”
At best for the state GOP, it is an opportunity to clarify what the party is all about.
“Kudos to the California Republicans for condemning this e-mail," says Robert Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies. "In these days of birther talk from Donald Trump, et al., it is refreshing to see Republican leaders taking a strong stand against unacceptable behavior."
Monday, April 18, 2011
Assignment: Editorial Essay
![]() |
| Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook CEO |
Is Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, as some say, a brilliant innovator who has reshaped the way millions in the world connect with one another? Or is he, as others have argued, is he an overly-powerful and unscrupulous entrepreneur? Zuckerberg has clearly made an indelible mark on 21st century life, but does his creation threaten to become too powerful? And what of the disputed origins of Facebook? Should the allegations against Zuckerberg give us pause about his creation? Can we trust Zuckerberg, and Facebook, with our private information? What is your view of Mark Zuckerberg?
In a concise editorial, illustrate your views on this most iconic of personalities. Cite evidence from The Accidental Billionaires and the Zuckerberg articles and videos we read and watched this week to support your thesis.
Requirements:
- MLA format, including parenthetical citation
- 2.5-page minimum
- Cite at least four articles/videos, in addition to The Accidental Billionaires
The best papers:
- Stay within the parameters of the subject matter
- Have a concise thesis which clearly outlines a position
- Are written in a voice that is casual, yet informed
- Clearly support the thesis with solid evidence and a logical structure, citing from the Zuckerberg articles and videos, as well as The Accidental Billionaires
- Cite a minimum of four articles/videos, in addition to The Accidental Billionaires
- Conclude with a summation of the argument
- Properly cite evidence using MLA's parenthetical citation method
- Are in compliance with MLA Style
Sample editorials:
- "America’s Elites Have a Duty to the Rest of Us" (Washington Post)
- "The Oil Spill, One Year Later" (New York Times)
- "The Best Remedy for the Price of Gas" (Los Angeles Times)
- "Finally, Both Parties are in the Battle Over Debt and Deficit" (Dallas Morning News)
- "Want Fries with That?" (Chicago Tribune)
- "Sleeping Flight Controllers are One Harsh Wake-Up Call" (The Oregonian)
Due: Mo 4. 25 / Tu 4.26 (Bring three copies)
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Week 13: Mendocino
![]() |
| Mendocino Bay |
Talk to me of Mendocino
Closing my eyes I hear the sea
Must I wait
Must I follow
Won't you say come with me
Closing my eyes I hear the sea
Must I wait
Must I follow
Won't you say come with me
—Linda Ronstadt, "Talk to Me of Mendocino"
Week 13: Mendocino
Mo 4.18 / Tu 4.19
Read: MYCAL—“The Line” by Ruben Martinez, “Flirting with Urbanismo” by Patt Morrison,
In-class: Reading discussion
We 4.20 / Th 4.21
We 4.20 / Th 4.21
Read: MYCAL— “My Little Saigon” by Ahn Do, “The Nicest Person in San Francisco” by Derek Powaze, “The Un-California” by Daniel Weintraub
In-class: Reading discussion; Lecture—“California on TV”Sa 4/23
Field trip: Alcatraz Island—Participation optional
Week 14: San Francisco
Mo 4. 25 / Tu 4.26
In-class: Writer’s workshop; Preview—Autobiographical essay
Due: Editorial essay (Draft 1, bring 3 copies)
We 4.27 / Th 4.28
In-class: Guest speakers, TBA
Due: Reflection 7
Note: Don't forget that my Monday office hour is moved to Tuesday until May 9th!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)












